Saturday, March 31, 2007
And what about this?
We need a new topic, my friend. As a result of your latent cannibalism, that last one went nowhere. Let's see... Say technology makes it possible to perfectly and instantly duplicate organisms/objects (think 'Star Trek') with some sort of machine. If Suzie Q were to duplicate herself in the contraption and subsequently decided that Suzie Q the Second was superhot, and 'sweet sweet lovin's' ensued, would that be masturbation or normal intercourse? Furthermore, since the two are genetically related, is it incest? Note that we're talking a perfect replica here, not a clone (which is not a perfect replica except by genes) or an identical twin.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
i would definitely have to call that masturbation. the person that you're having sweet sweet lovin' with isn't different, its YOU. as for the incect, i'm not sure. its yorself, so your not technically related, right?
OK miss I Speeel Gud, what are incect and yorself? Anyway, you're still two distinct beings--you don't share the same thoughts and motives, not exactly, because though you are composed of identical material in every way, and a moment ago you were like one mind, you're distinct now. So the acts of sweet sweet lovin' Susie Q the First is performing might be much appreciated by Susie Q the Second, but they aren't directly as a result of Susie Q the Second's actions and motives. I declare this intercourse!
As for incest, since the two are replicas of one another, they are genetically related. As such, I belive their acts of sweet sweet lovin' are, in fact, incest! Not only that, it's incest a step above sleeping with your identical twin, because you not only appear identical, you are identical, and were the same person like two seconds ago.
i disagree! swwet sweet lovin' can't be incest if the recipient of such sweet sweet lovin' is yourself! because, even though suzie 2 is a seperate entity, she is still part of suzie 1! therefore, it is masturbation as well! if you were able to put the two back together afterwards, this argument would be much stronger, as i can see where moral dilemma would ensue in the current sate!
and wow, the punctuation in that post consisted entirely of exclamation points!
My enthusisatic friend, being a separate entity REQUIRES that you are not a component of another entity, but are a complete entity in your own right. That means that though Suzies 1 and 2 were recently one entity, they are now two, and separate. Same origin, but now different people! That means this is not masturbation, but (incestual) intercourse.
but if you were just made form anothre person, and are not a clone, you ARE a component of them, even if you are in a different form or body. therefore, sex would be masturbation.
But you don't share the same mind or anything!
Post a Comment