And what about this?

We need a new topic, my friend. As a result of your latent cannibalism, that last one went nowhere. Let's see... Say technology makes it possible to perfectly and instantly duplicate organisms/objects (think 'Star Trek') with some sort of machine. If Suzie Q were to duplicate herself in the contraption and subsequently decided that Suzie Q the Second was superhot, and 'sweet sweet lovin's' ensued, would that be masturbation or normal intercourse? Furthermore, since the two are genetically related, is it incest? Note that we're talking a perfect replica here, not a clone (which is not a perfect replica except by genes) or an identical twin.

So...

If you've come to enrich your mind with tidbits of thoughtful discussion and enlightening discourse, please turn back before we cause any more damage. This page will be devoted entirely to thoughtless, pointless, inane rambling and meaningless 'discussion.' If you want content, I have tucked that away in my other blog--which I must also caution you not to read, since it never (and I mean never) updates and will bore you almost instantly. Just take my word for it.

Anyway, let's get this 'thing' started with a topic. I'm waxing a bit philosophical tonight, so here it is: what's more morally reprihensible, cannibalism or autocannibalism?